Writing Game Eight – 5 AM
Author function: Scriptor
Notion: Heartbreak/Sadness
The airport is silent that morning. It is barely 5 am, and
artificial light lights up the room. Outside, darkness still rules, and fog has
crept in, almost as a representation of her mood that morning. Being here was
the last thing she wanted. She could not bear the thought of being alone once
again. They had known this would happen from the beginning. This was part of
it, but it was hard for her to accept.
Walking in, they barely spoke, the huge suitcase got checked
in and everything was ready. Then there was nothing to do but wait. Wait for
the inevitable moment when it was time to say goodbye.
When it happened, she fought so hard not to cry, yet it was
breaking her heart to have to do this. They shared a long hug, looked deep into
each other’s eyes. She knew her tears were blatantly obvious, but in that
moment, she couldn’t control it anymore. Their lips found each other in a deep,
shaky kiss, hearts pounding and hands shaking. This was it.
“I love you..”
“I love you too..” – So much!
Then her love disappeared into the crowd and all that was
left for her was to go home.
Reflections:
Writing as a scriptor allows for more emotions to come
through and for a story to be told. Furthermore, the story has potential is
more personal and engaging. In the text above, the notion of heartbreak and
sadness is viewed from a personal point of view in order to make the reader
feel the pain of the characters. This is different from other types of author
functions in the way that the reader gets a closer look at who the characters
are. In academic writing, this type of closeness is not needed or created.
Had the notion of sadness/heartbreak needed to be described
in an academic fashion, the article would have included studies describing in
detail what happens biologically when a person feels such emotions and why they
occur. Studies of how to deal with such emotions in the best way would also be
included. Also, and academic article would include thoroughly reliable sources
and a reference list of these at the end.
Finally, the language itself would be formal and from a
neutral point of view in an academic article. The sentences would be more
complex and longer while in the text above, the sentences are straight forward
and full of biased language.
Yes, the comparison with an academic author function is obviously correct, but how would a scriptor write differently from some much closely related author function, say that of a romance novelist, for instance?
ReplyDeleteThe third person narrator in your text could perhaps also be read as a fairly distant type of narrator, so how does that fit with your stated intention of allowing for more emotions to come through? Just a couple of questions to reflect on... The text conveys the stated abstract notions/feelings beautifully.